Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Module and inverter names #227

Closed
Peque opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Module and inverter names #227

Peque opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
pv pvsam1, pvwatts, hcpv

Comments

@Peque
Copy link

Peque commented Sep 26, 2019

There used to be a separator (:) between the manufacturer name and the model name, but it seems that is no longer the case.

I think that is very useful. Otherwise, how can someone separate them? It seems like non-trivial.

Maybe they should be 2 separate columns?

@janinefreeman
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Peque , thanks for posting! I believe that we process the names from the CEC database exactly as they record them, and that process is unfortunately outside of our control. However, we have been working with different stakeholders and collaborators at Sandia to try to move in a direction where we can use unique IDs for each piece of equipment. Hopefully this will help the manufacturer and model name be more easily distinguished in the future.

@cwhanse
Copy link

cwhanse commented Oct 14, 2019

@janinefreeman I need to setup the project space we discussed, for generating the model coefficient file from the CEC list or other input. That would be a first step towards addressing the unique name issue.

@cwhanse
Copy link

cwhanse commented Oct 15, 2019

There's a project that is developing a registry that would provide a unique string for hardware items. See a static demo here. We hope that this registry service goes live soon. I foresee using the product code from this registry (when available) as the key to look up module parameters. @shelcrow

@dguittet dguittet added the pv pvsam1, pvwatts, hcpv label Sep 24, 2020
@Peque
Copy link
Author

Peque commented Oct 9, 2021

@janinefreeman Could you briefly explain the reason for closing this issue? (was it fixed, rejected, marked as invalid...) 😊

@janinefreeman
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Peque ! We were doing some housekeeping, and this looked like an issue that we don't have a path forward on, given the inverter/module names we use come directly from the CEC. Happy to revive if we end up with a viable project to pull better names from! Let me know if there's activity in that space that I've missed and I'm happy to reopen.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pv pvsam1, pvwatts, hcpv
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants