Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving Hash Bookmarks #382

Open
mattwinans opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Improving Hash Bookmarks #382

mattwinans opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@mattwinans
Copy link

mattwinans commented Jul 22, 2016

In regards to the Hash Bookmarks setting:

Add hash bookmarks
On each slide, a # will be added to the end of the url in the url bar. These urls are bookmarkable, so you can share or return to the same place in the timeline later.

This is very helpful, but there are two things that are preventing me from using this feature:

1) Eliminating the "Hash" for the first "default" slide.
I do not believe this should be happening on the first slide. That is not useful for those placing the timeline in a block on a page that isn't completely dedicated to the timeline. Reason: the link to the page that embeds the timeline is "always" the link to the default (First or Last) slide.

2) Scroll to timeline if hash link is accessed.
I have a very long page with a timeline at the bottom. If the hash bookmarks are intended to bring people to a particular slide, this feature is meaningless in my use case.

Thank you in advance and hoping this gets some attention.

@JoeGermuska
Copy link
Member

@mattwinans these seem reasonable. The hash bookmarks don't get quite as much attention as they should because the vast majority of TimelineJS users use iframes, where the bookmarks are not functional.

We'll put this on the list, although to be honest, we haven't got a lot of staff time dedicated to Timeline enhancements at the moment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants