You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2019. It is now read-only.
This is not urgent as the checks that are being done are valid (i.e. balls that are inside the quadrilateral found for a goal are being removed) but this should be done in a cleaner way, perhaps a post processing method that considers all detected object types as a collective rather than purely finding each one individually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is not urgent as the checks that are being done are valid (i.e. balls that are inside the quadrilateral found for a goal are being removed) but this should be done in a cleaner way, perhaps a post processing method that considers all detected object types as a collective rather than purely finding each one individually.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Probably, it essentially needs to be another small stage. Objects that are rediculous in and of themselves are removed during the detection process, but there also needs to be consideration for object type combinations that are rediculous, for example balls that are between the edges but above the base of a goal post etc.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This is not urgent as the checks that are being done are valid (i.e. balls that are inside the quadrilateral found for a goal are being removed) but this should be done in a cleaner way, perhaps a post processing method that considers all detected object types as a collective rather than purely finding each one individually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: