-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
What's the point of NVIDIA Driver Container if it requires >= 418.81.07 NVIDIA Driver as dependency in the first place? #1681
Comments
I think that might be a issue with our documentation. The NVIDIA Driver Container does not need the NVIDIA Container Toolkit to run, but the container toolkit must be configured to specify a different |
Thanks @elezar , this is the line in the documentation (underlined with red) that could be misleading: |
For GPU Operator's use case. Driver Container is loaded first, then Container Toolkit container is loaded. This satisfies the dependency correctly. Driver Container itself does not depend on Container Toolkit, although it can work with it. For manually loading Driver Container, such as through docker. You would want to load Driver Container first. And if you choose to use Container Toolkit (you do not have to use it), you'd follow the instructions for configuring /etc/nvidia-container-runtime/config.toml. You would configure the |
@junwang-wish |
No worries, thanks for the clarification @nvjmayo |
Thank you! |
This is a general question about the motivation of NVIDIA Driver Container. My understanding is that it is one out of three ways to install NVIDIA Driver, supposedly the most portable and easy way.
However it is surprising that NVIDIA Driver Container requires NVIDIA Container Toolkit as a dependency, and NVIDIA Container Toolkit requires >= 418.81.07 NVIDIA Driver as a dependency...
If NVIDIA Driver Container's purpose is to make NVIDIA Driver installation easy, why does it require an installed driver in the first place?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: