Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training with raw un-normalized mel features was resulting in a clean synthesis #197

Closed
berger-ulak opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@berger-ulak
Copy link

Hello all,
In this answer @sharathadavanne suggests to train waveglow model with raw un-normalized mel features. Can someone explain what does it mean?

Do we need to un-normalize wav files or is there any parameter in settings?

@sharathadavanne
Copy link

Hi @berger-ulak go ahead and use the waveglow code as it is. It works perfectly fine.

In the issue you tagged, I was trying to improve the wavegan performance by using normalized features, which did not help me.

@berger-ulak
Copy link
Author

@sharathadavanne , thank you sir!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants