New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pose Estimation without tracking, poor perfomance #97
Comments
Hi, there are typically issues about setting up your data, in particular the depth format. I'd suggest to search in the issues as there are couple related. The estimated poses are object to the camera. |
Hi @dhanushTDS and @wenbowen123, in order to perform pose estimation of multiple images, do we need to provide mask for each input rgb image? |
If we do what @ wenbowen123 mentioned, where we are not tracking; instead, we treat each image as a sample from an unordered sequence, then we have to supply the mask to the estimator for each image. In their example code, they are tracking on frames of a continuous video and only need the mask for the first image. |
Thanks @dhanushTDS |
When doing pose estimation only and no tracking, what is the suggested format for RGB, Depth, and Mask Images? Currently, I have scraped some of your code together like this, but I am getting poor results.
Also, to clarify what does the pose correspond to : the transformation of object wrt to camera or the other way around
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: