New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
results are different between roi pooling and roi align #23
Comments
#19 also reported this. I didn't use RoI-align in our exps, so this is also the first time I heard this. Let me take a look |
maybe the issue is sampling_ratio? in maskrcnn-benchmark, they set this to 2: https://github.com/facebookresearch/maskrcnn-benchmark/blob/57eec25b75144d9fb1a6857f32553e1574177daf/configs/pascal_voc/e2e_mask_rcnn_R_50_FPN_1x_cocostyle.yaml#L20 but this repo set the default value to 0: wetectron/wetectron/config/defaults.py Line 241 in e4fc028
So maybe try 2? |
I have tried sampling_ratio = 2, but the results have no difference. |
Hello, have you conducted any experiments with FPN structure like R50-FPN? I never see any relational experiments in recent papers. |
We did try, but it didn't outperform vanilla ResNet-C4 model. The multi-scale setting made it overfit to small regions somehow. |
what do you mean 'vanilla FPN model'? Does it mean that performance of MIST-R50-C4 model is better than MIST-R50-FPN model? |
sorry typo, should be vanilla ResNet-C4 models. changed my prev answers |
I've got it , thank you very much! |
Thanks for sharing such wonderful works!
I have used your codes to train OICR-vgg16, the mAP is 43% when I use roi-pooling. But when I use roi align, the mAP just have 23%. Difference between this two config is only 'POOLER_METHOD', Have you meets this problem in experiment?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: