Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

project owner does not seem to maintain this project anymore #169

Closed
ritchieGitHub opened this issue Apr 10, 2015 · 13 comments
Closed

project owner does not seem to maintain this project anymore #169

ritchieGitHub opened this issue Apr 10, 2015 · 13 comments

Comments

@ritchieGitHub
Copy link
Member

after waiting to for my pull request to be included (adaptations for deployment to central) for a while i noticed that the project owner has not reacted to any request for almost a year.

There are a lot of bug fixes and features waiting, so who is with me to create a new organisation and start a new maintained fork? I do not have the time (i have a lot of other open-source projects I work on more actively) to go into the core of this project but i am willing to help with build issues, unit-tests travis-ci and so.

But if there are some developers that will take the core part of the job, like checking if a pull request is plausible or would break something (that's not yet in the unit test ;-) ). Than I can take the part of build structure, releasing and central deployment.

anyone?

@elonen
Copy link
Member

elonen commented Apr 10, 2015

I personally haven't maintained the project since it was imported to Github and converted to Java >1.1.
@psh , looks like your latest Github and Twitter activities are from last November, are you still with us?

@hewmeister
Copy link

This product seems too useful to be abandoned. I can probably help with testing.

@elonen
Copy link
Member

elonen commented Apr 11, 2015

Just noticed it was private for some reason, but I'm an admin in the project. If @psh turns out to be MIA, I can grant writing rights to people, so no need for a fork just for the sake of getting the project maintainable again.

@ritchieGitHub
Copy link
Member Author

Great, that means much better changes to get it going again! How long would you say, should we wait for @psh to react?

@ritchieGitHub
Copy link
Member Author

@elonen I propose to wait till end of the month, if @psh is still MIA then could you include me as project member? Then I will include the central release stuff and prepare a 2.2 release where we can include the most important pull requests. There are so many, so we should probably do a voting.

@elmot
Copy link

elmot commented Apr 17, 2015

@ritchieGitHub, @elonen I agree

@elonen
Copy link
Member

elonen commented Apr 19, 2015

That sounds reasonable @ritchieGitHub. Some complications arose with admin settings, but I'm currently trying and sort them out.

@ritchieGitHub
Copy link
Member Author

Could you add me as an admin, then I will update the project and when that is finished we can start the voting.

@elonen
Copy link
Member

elonen commented May 1, 2015

Added. There's a problem, however: @psh has apparently forgot to add the main repository to the admin group. Creating a new repository under the NanoHttpd "organization" works though, so one possibility would be to for the current main one into e.g. "NanoHttpd/nanohttpd-dev", and start merging stuff there. I'll keep on trying to reach Paul.

@ritchieGitHub
Copy link
Member Author

that would be a solution, but lets try to contact github themself. I send them a request, maybe they will grant us the access rights. I may have found a good project icon
c34-c2-5 . It is a Carbon molecule extremely small and extremely powerfull ;-)

@elonen
Copy link
Member

elonen commented May 2, 2015 via email

@elonen
Copy link
Member

elonen commented May 2, 2015

I've got full access now, so no need for an extra repository anymore. Thank you @psh !

@elonen elonen closed this as completed May 2, 2015
@ritchieGitHub
Copy link
Member Author

yes, great thanks @psh

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants