Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status and scope of openmath branch #168

Open
kpeeters opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Status and scope of openmath branch #168

kpeeters opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@kpeeters
Copy link

I am working on using MicroTeX for the notebook interface of my symbolic computer algebra software Cadabra. This all works very nicely, many thanks for the great work!

In order to know where to focus my attention, can someone perhaps give a quick summary of the status of the openmath branch, and the scope of features it tries to include beyond the main branch? Am I best off using openmath or is it, for stability, better to stick to the main branch for now?

@sp1ritCS
Copy link
Contributor

MicroTeX (openmath) is supposed to replace the legacy cLaTeXMath version eventually. Practically no new things will ever be added to cLaTeXMath again and development was only focused on MicroTeX, but it seems to have stalled the last half year.

The latest update regarding a proper release was #160 (comment), where Nano wanted at least some more bugs fixed (some equations cause segfaults, mostly nullptr derefs) and some documentation but given that nothing happened on that wrong it's kinda stuck in limbo.

I'd still suggest you go with MicroTeX, it's API is unlikely to change and a large chunk of crashing equations have only been fixed for MicroTeX. Also CLM has a bit of a licensing issue, as it is a rewrite of jLaTeXMath, but with MIT license instead of the original GPL-3.0, while still using JLM assets (not that this should be an issue for you, given that your app is already GPL-3.0 licensed :)).

@kpeeters
Copy link
Author

kpeeters commented May 4, 2024

I have played a bit with the openmath branch now, and it looks like there are various things not yet working (e.g. using boldface fonts in text mode, \text{\bf hello}). Am I doing things wrong or should I not yet expect all typesetting that the master branch handles correctly to work in the openmath branch?

@sp1ritCS
Copy link
Contributor

sp1ritCS commented May 4, 2024

(e.g. using boldface fonts in text mode, \text{\bf hello}). Am I doing things wrong or should I not yet expect all typesetting that the master branch handles correctly to work in the openmath branch?

I've done some quick testing: https://nanomichael.github.io/MicroTeX/?tex=\textbf{ASD}\\\mathbf{ASD}
and it seems that bold font only works when setting a main font (the web demo only provides XITS, I'll investigate using LatinModern as main font tomorrow). But if you initialize µTeX correctly, bold fonts should work.

@kpeeters
Copy link
Author

kpeeters commented May 5, 2024

Ah, you're right, I was not setting fonts correctly. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants