Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ERROR DURING SWEEP argument out of range with NanoVNA V2 #327

Closed
ok1vaw opened this issue Sep 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

ERROR DURING SWEEP argument out of range with NanoVNA V2 #327

ok1vaw opened this issue Sep 13, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@ok1vaw
Copy link

ok1vaw commented Sep 13, 2020

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
when changing number of points this error appears. if you confirm it, nanovna saver continues with those borders OK.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. set 51 points sweep from 1MHz to 60MHz, make a sweep.
    2.change the 60MHz to 64MHz
  2. push sweep again
  3. Error appears.
    5.click OK
  4. Sweep starts.

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
This should not happen.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS] win 10
  • Python version: [if applicable]
  • NanoVNA-Saver version: [e.g. 0.1.4] 0.3.7
    error during sweep
    debug for test2.txt

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@ok1vaw ok1vaw changed the title ERROR DURING SWEEP argument out of range ERROR DURING SWEEP argument out of range with NanoVNA V2 Sep 28, 2020
@Mike4U
Copy link
Contributor

Mike4U commented Oct 19, 2020

see #322 at Mike4U. This finally worked for me on NanoVNASaver 0.3.8 pre03 but I think it will make other versions work too.

@zarath zarath closed this as completed Sep 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants