Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

poor dogbolt performance #5228

Closed
psifertex opened this issue Apr 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

poor dogbolt performance #5228

psifertex opened this issue Apr 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@psifertex
Copy link

Just wanted to reach out and ask if there's a way we could improve the performance of Ghidra on dogbolt.org.

You can see how we currently automate decompilation here:

https://github.com/decompiler-explorer/decompiler-explorer/blob/master/runners/decompiler/decompile_ghidra.py#L28-L38
and:
https://github.com/decompiler-explorer/decompiler-explorer/blob/master/runners/decompiler/tools/ghidra/DecompilerExplorer.java

We're seeing significantly worse performance than I'd expect and I'm not sure whether there are any obvious improvements to the automation we can make and any advice from the official devs would be appreciated!

@NationalSecurityAgency NationalSecurityAgency locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 18, 2023
@ryanmkurtz ryanmkurtz converted this issue into discussion #5230 Apr 18, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant