We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
starknet
starknet's address format: 0xHEXSTRING_32_BYTES (compressed public key?).
0xHEXSTRING_32_BYTES
Which is different from ethereum's 0xHASH_OF_PUBKEY_20_BYTES.
ethereum
0xHASH_OF_PUBKEY_20_BYTES
So starknet platform is not duplicated with current ethereum platform, and worth supporting.
validators/starknet should be provided, both implementation and unit tests.
validators/starknet
Signature verifying procedure should only rely on signatures generated by starknet identity in starknet's wallet app.
You should figure out which signing algorithm is popular among starknet community and wallets, and use it in our verifying workflow.
You may take validators/ethereum as a sample.
validators/ethereum
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Description
starknet
's address format:0xHEXSTRING_32_BYTES
(compressed public key?).Which is different from
ethereum
's0xHASH_OF_PUBKEY_20_BYTES
.So
starknet
platform is not duplicated with currentethereum
platform, and worth supporting.
Expected outcomes
validators/starknet
should be provided, both implementation and unit tests.Signature verifying procedure should only rely on signatures generated
by
starknet
identity instarknet
's wallet app.You should figure out which signing algorithm is popular among
starknet
community and wallets, and use it in our verifyingworkflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: