Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Diversity of input folder names #2

Open
Dx-wmc opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Diversity of input folder names #2

Dx-wmc opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Dx-wmc
Copy link

Dx-wmc commented Oct 30, 2023

It's great to see such a great tool, I realized in my own case that if I use a Bakta folder, the fna file needs to be the same as the folder name. For example if my folder is set to Ecoli_23_BAKTA, StORF will only look for Ecoli_23_BAKTA.fna, when in fact the contents of my folder is Ecoli_23.fna. So would it be possible to add an option to cope with this situation.

@NickJD
Copy link
Owner

NickJD commented Oct 30, 2023

Hi. I am currently looking into making it easier and more 'user-driven' for selecting input files and hopefully, I will have some progress on this soon.
Thanks for the request.

@NickJD NickJD added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 30, 2023
@NickJD
Copy link
Owner

NickJD commented Dec 19, 2023

Sorry for the delay.
Please try v1.2.0 with the "-af" option to provide the alternative filename:
StORF-Reporter -anno Bakta Out_Dir -p ./Ecoli_23_BAKTA -af Ecoli_23

@NickJD NickJD closed this as completed Dec 19, 2023
@NickJD NickJD self-assigned this Dec 19, 2023
@elchaarn
Copy link

Hi Nick, I have a similar problem when using the "Multiple_Out_Dirs": #1
Can you make the above modification for running multiple directories with names different than the file names?

@NickJD NickJD reopened this Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants