Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Support default AV1 output option, take 2 #1099

Closed
saschanaz opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

[Feature Request] Support default AV1 output option, take 2 #1099

saschanaz opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
⬜ Completed Status • Issue solved. 🔷Enhancement Type • Improvements for the software.
Milestone

Comments

@saschanaz
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It has been a few years since I opened #547. It seems it's now supported well.

Describe the solution you'd like

-vsync passthrough 
-hwaccel auto 
{I} 
-c:v librav1e 
-preset fast 
-pix_fmt yuv420p 
-vf "scale=trunc(iw/2)*2:trunc(ih/2)*2" 
-crf 30 
-b:v 0 
-f webm 
{O}

Describe alternatives you've considered
libaom-av1 also exists but librav1e was over 2 times faster and generated smaller file with the above options.

Additional context

@saschanaz saschanaz added ⬜ Pending Status • This issue stills needs to be analyzed. 🔷Enhancement Type • Improvements for the software. labels Apr 14, 2022
@NickeManarin
Copy link
Owner

I'll add support for 3 new encoders (libaom (libaom-av1), SVT-AV1 (libsvtav1), and rav1e (librav1e)), but the correct version of ffmpeg.exe needs to be used.

I'll update the ffmpeg downloader to get version 4.4.1.

@NickeManarin NickeManarin added ⬜ In Progress Status • Someone is working on making changes to solve this issue. ⬜ Completed Status • Issue solved. and removed ⬜ Pending Status • This issue stills needs to be analyzed. ⬜ In Progress Status • Someone is working on making changes to solve this issue. labels Apr 15, 2022
@NickeManarin NickeManarin added this to the 2.37 milestone Apr 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⬜ Completed Status • Issue solved. 🔷Enhancement Type • Improvements for the software.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants