[pl] Wrong ordinal spelling?

[tengwar]

I'm using the online demo. In Polish it spells 75 as "siedemdziesiąt piąty" and 44 as "czterdzieści czwarty". I'm not a language expert but everyone I know says "siedemdziesiąty piąty" and "czterdziesty czwarty". When I try just 70 or 40, the results are correct ("siedemdziesiąty" and "czterdziesty").

(For feminine and neuter forms it would be "siedemdziesiąta piąta" and "siedemdziesiąte piąte" respectively.)

[laszlonemeth]

Fixed in the data file, and it will be fixed also on the demo page soon. Thanks for your bug report.

[tengwar]

I see you've added cases for "-eści" and "-siąt" but there's also "dwadzieścia", for example "dwadzieścia dwa" (22) - "dwudziesty drugi" (22nd).

And by testing this i noticed another issue: ordinal of 20 shows as "dwadziesty" but it should be "dwudziesty".

I've also noticed potential issues with larger numbers, e.g. ordinal of 200 000 shows as "dwieścietysięczny" but I'm not sure if it should be "dwustutysięczny" (which is in common use) or "dwieście tysięczny" which - as some guy argues here - is correct according to general rules of ordinals. I guess a language specialist should take a look at it.

[laszlonemeth]

Thanks, I have reopened this issue, many thanks for the detailed source.

[tengwar]

The source seems more like "what is theoretically correct according to general grammar rules", not "what people are actually using" and not "what is in the dictionaries". That's why I said a language specialist should take a look at it.

But I'm certain when it comes to the "20" issue. :)