Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[URL] Operations should be supported gracefully #120

Closed
lewischeng-ms opened this issue Jul 20, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

[URL] Operations should be supported gracefully #120

lewischeng-ms opened this issue Jul 20, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@lewischeng-ms
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, if we want to define a function or an action, we need to put two copies of definition in both domain class and controller class. The implementation in domain class is useless while only its declaration is used to generate the operation definition in the EDM model. The implementation in the controller class will get called actually. We should let user write only one copy of operation code and generate model according to that.

@lewischeng-ms lewischeng-ms changed the title [Protocol] Operations should be supported gracefully [URL] Operations should be supported gracefully Jul 20, 2015
@karataliu karataliu added this to the v0.3 milestone Jul 30, 2015
@lewischeng-ms lewischeng-ms self-assigned this Sep 2, 2015
@lewischeng-ms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Model building of functions and actions is supported.
Related commits:
1460432
b97531f

@chinadragon0515
Copy link
Contributor

Support operation without additional controller is tracked with issue #378, and will be added in the release after 0.5 release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants