Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subcontractors not relied upon have to provide information about Selection Criteria #381

Closed
lschoonjans opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
3rd party Pending for 3rd party information or decision

Comments

@lschoonjans
Copy link

lschoonjans commented Mar 22, 2023

Hello ESPD team,

GROW had a workshop with Slovenia about eProcurement. Following the legislation, entities not relied upon (subcontractors) do not need to fill in the Selection Criteria. However, following the ESPD model the Selection Criteria must be filled in also for the entities not relied upon (subcontractors).

Could you please propose changes to the model as to be aligned with the legislation?

Thank you in advance,

Best regards,

Laurent

@pascalinelaur
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @lschoonjans,

Thank you for your question. We are cyurrently analysing it and we will come back to you as soon we have a proposal.

Kind regards,
The ESPD Team.

@arillpa arillpa added the TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders label Sep 19, 2023
@dragos-eu dragos-eu self-assigned this Jan 24, 2024
@dragos-eu
Copy link
Collaborator

dragos-eu commented Feb 15, 2024

Hello @lschoonjans ,

Following the direct discussion that we had with Slovenia on 15.02.2024. We agreed that the way forward is to move to either ESPD v3.3.0 or to ESPD v4.0.0. Both versions support accepted solution.

The Code List EORoleType.gc have been modified from v2.X to v3.x so that the Subcontractor has been introduced while Other entity (relied upon) was deleted. This is in line with the directive and each CA may request or not the EO to provide separate information in the form of ESPD Response, according to the MS specific regulation.

Kind regards,
The ESPD Team

@dragos-eu dragos-eu removed the TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders label Feb 15, 2024
@dragos-eu dragos-eu added the 3rd party Pending for 3rd party information or decision label Feb 28, 2024
@dragos-eu
Copy link
Collaborator

Since there are any further comments, we proceed to close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3rd party Pending for 3rd party information or decision
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants