You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We received this feedback on the mapping of forms F06 from @muricna :
VI.4.4 Mappings do not show which level of Agent in role is being used primary, secondary or tertiary is this a problem see 231436-2021 which has a secondary role for Service from which information about the review procedure maybe obtained?
It is not clear how ePO supports the representation of various levels of Agent in Role. I opened this ticket so that it can be further discussed in the EPO WG meetings.
The generalisation statement between a role and its type (AcquiringParty, SellerParty or AuxiliaryParty) should not be present in the technical mapping. This will be inferred from ePO.
We received this feedback on the mapping of forms F06 from @muricna :
It is not clear how ePO supports the representation of various levels of Agent in Role. I opened this ticket so that it can be further discussed in the EPO WG meetings.
PS: This is the relevant generated RDF output: https://github.com/OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping/blob/release/tx1.2/mappings/package_F06/output/231436-2021/231436-2021.ttl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: