Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Representing level of Agent in role #418

Closed
csnyulas opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Representing level of Agent in role #418

csnyulas opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@csnyulas
Copy link

We received this feedback on the mapping of forms F06 from @muricna :

VI.4.4 Mappings do not show which level of Agent in role is being used primary, secondary or tertiary is this a problem see 231436-2021 which has a secondary role for Service from which information about the review procedure maybe obtained?

It is not clear how ePO supports the representation of various levels of Agent in Role. I opened this ticket so that it can be further discussed in the EPO WG meetings.

PS: This is the relevant generated RDF output: https://github.com/OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping/blob/release/tx1.2/mappings/package_F06/output/231436-2021/231436-2021.ttl

@costezki costezki added this to the 2023 Q1 milestone Nov 23, 2022
@costezki costezki added type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release module: ePO core ePO core labels Nov 23, 2022
@csnyulas
Copy link
Author

This is again brought up in: OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping#289

@costezki costezki added type: clarification needed and removed type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release labels Jan 24, 2023
@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

The generalisation statement between a role and its type (AcquiringParty, SellerParty or AuxiliaryParty) should not be present in the technical mapping. This will be inferred from ePO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants