2020-04-RC2: RSM File Output

[OPMUSER]

Looks very good, just a few niggles:

• For the DATE output column change MAI to MAY.
• For the first page only the second column should always be YEARS. Not too concerned about the DAY, MONTH and YEAR Columns, because I never used these vectors.
  
  For reference the commercial simulator has:
  
• Delete the text in the header "OPM FLOW VERSION 1910 ANYTHING CAN GO HERE: USER, MACHINE ETC." and replace with OPM Flow version and anything else you feel would be useful, time/date of generation etc.
• For Norne it takes awhile to write out the RSM file, so consider adding the following messages to the terminal and print file:

 Start: Writing of Summary CASENAME.RSM
 End: Writing of Summary CASENAME.RSM

or something similar.

Now when you don't specify the DATE you should still get the YEARS vector as well in the second column. Also the TIME vector format looks strange:

Compared with commercial simulator's output:

Other than the above it looks very good. I loaded the RSM file without the DATE option into some utilities I have and everything worked, so the layout etc is perfect.

[joakim-hove]

Thank you for the feedback; I will try to fix these issues for the release

[joakim-hove]

For the first page only the second column should always be YEARS.

This sentence I do not understand. Should the second column be YEARS for all pages?

[joakim-hove]

Now when you don't specify the DATE you should still get the YEARS vector as well in the second

I struggle a bit with understanding the YEARS column - my understanding now is:

1. You should always have a YEARS column - irrespective of whether DATES is used or not.
2. The YEARScolumn should always be the second column on the first page.

Is this right?

[OPMUSER]

Yes, that is correct.

[joakim-hove]

Yes, that is correct.

Thank you.

[OPMUSER]

Still an issue with RSM file numerical output format, not a a big deal though.

The commercial simulator has this:

Whereas 2020-04 RC3 has:

Notice how the numbers fill the column width, but like I said not a big deal.

[joakim-hove]

Notice how the numbers fill the column width, but like I said not a big deal.

OK; I'll try to look into it.