Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Test for Outdated and Unsupported Components #1017

Open
1 task done
cyspad opened this issue Jan 7, 2023 · 22 comments
Open
1 task done

Adding Test for Outdated and Unsupported Components #1017

cyspad opened this issue Jan 7, 2023 · 22 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement A new or improved feature for the WSTG or repo revise Needs quality review, updates, or revision

Comments

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

What would you like added?

  • Add Test for Vulnerable Technologies Using

Would you like to be assigned to this issue?

  • Assign me, please!
@cyspad cyspad added help wanted new New content to write labels Jan 7, 2023
@rbsec
Copy link
Collaborator

rbsec commented Jan 7, 2023

This seems like a very generic title that could probably cover a large chunk of the guide. Are there specific technologies or areas that you're thinking about here?

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

This seems like a very generic title that could probably cover a large chunk of the guide. Are there specific technologies or areas that you're thinking about here?

In this test case, the tester checks whether it checks for vulnerable technologies and libraries (CVE).

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

Dear @rbsec and @kingthorin

Developers sometimes do not update the dependencies of the application and that dependency has a known vulnerability (CVES), for example, if it uses the jQuery library with version 3.4.1, it has CVE-2020-11023 and CVE-2020-11022 vulnerabilities in There is no such test case in wstg and I decided to add it.

@kingthorin
Copy link
Collaborator

This is covered in the information gathering section(s).

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

This is covered in the information gathering section(s).

ok thanks

@cyspad cyspad closed this as completed Jan 7, 2023
@rbsec
Copy link
Collaborator

rbsec commented Jan 7, 2023

I think that this is implied by the information gathering section, but there's perhaps some scope to make it a bit more explicit in some of the sections, and maybe to point to some specific tools (like retire.js) and references (wpscan vuln db, synk, etc) that can make this easier.

@rbsec rbsec reopened this Jan 7, 2023
@rbsec rbsec changed the title Adding Test for Vulnerable Technologies Adding Test for Outdated and Unsupported Components Jan 7, 2023
@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

ok but sometimes you don't have any information about your target, and you must be start testing CVE (Black Box) whit some tools like nuclei or nmap (--script vulners).

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

I think that this is implied by the information gathering section, but there's perhaps some scope to make it a bit more explicit in some of the sections, and maybe to point to some specific tools (like retire.js) and references (wpscan vuln db, synk, etc) that can make this easier.

Please tell me i add a new test case or edit some part of information gathering testcases (send link of section)

@kingthorin
Copy link
Collaborator

ok but sometimes you don't have any information about your target, and you must be start testing CVE (Black Box) whit some tools like nuclei or nmap (--script vulners).

No, you don’t jump straight to vuln scanning without having done recon.

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

Dear @kingthorin
I completely agree with you
But please consider this, in some cases, it only sees the type of web server or technology in the fingerprint
You should not be careless in these cases and you should start testing the black box or scanning

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

im ready for add or edit about this topic

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

i have question
Test for Race Condition can be add in WSTG?

@kingthorin
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. Yes this should be added, as part of an existing section. I’ll get back to you once I look around.
  2. I believe there’s already an open issue for Race Conditions.

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 7, 2023

  1. Yes this should be added, as part of an existing section. I’ll get back to you once I look around.

    1. I believe there’s already an open issue for Race Conditions.

ok i open a issue for rece condtion and for Test for Outdated and Unsupported Components Issue i waiting for your Decision

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 8, 2023

Hello
can you assign to me ?

@kingthorin kingthorin added enhancement A new or improved feature for the WSTG or repo revise Needs quality review, updates, or revision and removed help wanted new New content to write labels Jan 8, 2023
@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 8, 2023

Thanks, which one of the sections should be updates?

@kingthorin
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @cyspad sorry I haven’t been able to get back to this. I’ll try to get you an answer later today or tomorrow.

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 10, 2023

Thank you very much.

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 15, 2023

Dear @kingthorin
Any update?

@kingthorin
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, it’s still sitting in my inbox. Some stuff has just gotten in my way.

@cyspad
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyspad commented Jan 17, 2023

Sorry, it’s still sitting in my inbox. Some stuff has just gotten in my way.

ok thanks.

@kingthorin
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe this could be covered briefly as objectives of WSTG-INFO-08. It's already covered as part of the objective for WSTG-INFO-02.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement A new or improved feature for the WSTG or repo revise Needs quality review, updates, or revision
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants