You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having been worrying about what dynamic elements we're missing with such a simple model as LOBSTER I've started coding up PISCESv2. It is very complicated with a lot of tracers so may take me a while.
Even if we don't use it much it will be helpful to compare LOBSTER to and is helping me to understand the more complex elements of biogeochemistry. It will also be good to have the gold standard biogeochemical model available for other people to use/improve in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Sep 8, 2022, 7:11 PM +0100, Jago Strong-Wright ***@***.***>, wrote:
Having been worrying about what dynamic elements we're missing with such a simple model as LOBSTER I've started coding up PISCESv2. It is very complicated with a lot of tracers so may take me a while.
Even if we don't use it much it will be helpful to compare LOBSTER to and is helping me to understand the more complex elements of biogeochemistry. It will also be good to have the gold standard biogeochemical model available for other people to use/improve in the future.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Having been worrying about what dynamic elements we're missing with such a simple model as LOBSTER I've started coding up PISCESv2. It is very complicated with a lot of tracers so may take me a while.
Even if we don't use it much it will be helpful to compare LOBSTER to and is helping me to understand the more complex elements of biogeochemistry. It will also be good to have the gold standard biogeochemical model available for other people to use/improve in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: