Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FieldSet.from_mom does not consider grid rotation #1509

Open
erikvansebille opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

FieldSet.from_mom does not consider grid rotation #1509

erikvansebille opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug coding/Python help wanted oceanography Issues that require knowledge of oceanography to complete

Comments

@erikvansebille
Copy link
Member

As discovered by @eavellashaw, FieldSet.from_mom() does not consider grid rotation and thus gives erroneous results in regions where the grid is not rectilinear in the lon/lat direction. This needs to be fixed

@erikvansebille
Copy link
Member Author

A quick fix is to add rotation fields from e.g. the ice.static.nc file, as use a custom RotAdvection kernel (here in Euler Forward for simplicity):

fset = fields.from_mom(...)
fset.add_field(Field.from_netcdf(rotfile, 'COSROT', {'lon': 'GEOLON', 'lat': 'GEOLAT'}))
fset.add_field(Field.from_netcdf(rotfile, 'SINROT', {'lon': 'GEOLON', 'lat': 'GEOLAT'}))

ROTparticle = JITParticle.add_variables({Variable('cosrot'), Variable('sinrot')})

def RotAdvection(particle, fieldset, time):
    particle.cosrot = fieldset.COSROT.eval(time, particle.depth, particle.lat, particle.lon, particle)
    particle.sinrot = fieldset.SINROT.eval(time, particle.depth, particle.lat, particle.lon, particle)
    u, v = fieldset.UV.eval(time, particle.depth, particle.lat, particle.lon, particle, applyConversion=False)
    ur = (u * particle.cosrot + v * particle.sinrot)
    vr = (- u * particle.sinrot + v * particle.cosrot)

    # Euler Forward step and convert from m/s to degrees/s
    particle_dlon += ur * particle.dt / (1852. * 60.0 * math.cos(particle.lat * math.pi / 180.))
    particle_dlat += vr * particle.dt / (1852. * 60.0)

@eavellashaw
Copy link

After a lot of discussions (and a bit of debugging 😉), @eavellashaw, @noemieplanat, @michaeldenes, and @erikvansebille found a way to implement and account for the grid rotation in the AdvectionRK4_3D Kernel:

fset = FieldSet.from_mom5(...)

fset.add_field(Field.from_netcdf(rotfile, 'COSROT', {'lon': 'GEOLON', 'lat': 'GEOLAT'}))
fset.add_field(Field.from_netcdf(rotfile, 'SINROT', {'lon': 'GEOLON', 'lat': 'GEOLAT'}))

ROTparticle = JITParticle.add_variables({Variable('cosrot'), Variable('sinrot')})

def Rot_AdvectionRK4_3D(particle, fieldset, time): # Modified AdvectionRK4_3D Kernel to account for grid rotation
    particle.cosrot = fieldset.COSROT.eval(time, particle.depth, particle.lat, particle.lon, particle)
    particle.sinrot = fieldset.SINROT.eval(time, particle.depth, particle.lat, particle.lon, particle)
    
    (u1, v1, w1) = fieldset.UVW.eval(time, particle.depth, particle.lat, particle.lon, particle, applyConversion=False)
    
    ur1 = u1 * particle.cosrot + v1 * particle.sinrot
    vr1 = - u1 * particle.sinrot + v1 * particle.cosrot

    lon1 = particle.lon + ur1 * .5 * particle.dt / (1852. * 60. * math.cos(particle.lat * math.pi / 180.))
    lat1 = particle.lat + vr1 * .5 * particle.dt / (1852. * 60.)
    dep1 = particle.depth + w1 * .5 * particle.dt
    
    
    particle.cosrot = fieldset.COSROT.eval(time, dep1, lat1, lon1, particle)
    particle.sinrot = fieldset.SINROT.eval(time, dep1, lat1, lon1, particle)
    
    (u2, v2, w2) = fieldset.UVW.eval(time + .5 * particle.dt, dep1, lat1, lon1, particle, applyConversion=False)

    ur2 = u2 * particle.cosrot + v2 * particle.sinrot
    vr2 = - u2 * particle.sinrot + v2 * particle.cosrot
    
    lon2 = particle.lon + ur2 * .5 * particle.dt / (1852. * 60. * math.cos(particle.lat * math.pi / 180.))
    lat2 = particle.lat + vr2 * .5 * particle.dt / (1852. * 60.)
    dep2 = particle.depth + w2 * .5 * particle.dt
    
    
    particle.cosrot = fieldset.COSROT.eval(time, dep2, lat2, lon2, particle)
    particle.sinrot = fieldset.SINROT.eval(time, dep2, lat2, lon2, particle)
    
    (u3, v3, w3) = fieldset.UVW.eval(time + .5 * particle.dt, dep2, lat2, lon2, particle, applyConversion=False)
    
    ur3 = u3 * particle.cosrot + v3 * particle.sinrot
    vr3 = - u3 * particle.sinrot + v3 * particle.cosrot
    
    lon3 = particle.lon + ur3 * particle.dt / (1852. * 60. * math.cos(particle.lat * math.pi / 180.))
    lat3 = particle.lat + vr3 * particle.dt / (1852. * 60.)
    dep3 = particle.depth + w3 * particle.dt
    
    
    particle.cosrot = fieldset.COSROT.eval(time, dep3, lat3, lon3, particle)
    particle.sinrot = fieldset.SINROT.eval(time, dep3, lat3, lon3, particle)

    (u4, v4, w4) = fieldset.UVW.eval(time + particle.dt, dep3, lat3, lon3, particle, applyConversion=False)
    
    ur4 = u4 * particle.cosrot + v4 * particle.sinrot
    vr4 = - u4 * particle.sinrot + v4 * particle.cosrot
    
    particle_dlon += (ur1 + 2*ur2 + 2*ur3 + ur4) / 6. * particle.dt / (1852. * 60. * math.cos(particle.lat * math.pi / 180.))  # noqa
    particle_dlat += (vr1 + 2*vr2 + 2*vr3 + vr4) / 6. * particle.dt / (1852. * 60.)  # noqa
    particle_ddepth += (w1 + 2*w2 + 2*w3 + w4) / 6. * particle.dt  # noqa

When comparing to CM2.5 model outputs, this agrees very well with the pathways the particles should follow, here are two examples when using Rot_AdvectionRK4_3D:
Screenshot 2024-02-26 at 4 28 14 PM
Screenshot 2024-02-26 at 4 52 50 PM

This solves the problem! The next step would be to implement it in the Parcels code directly so the user does not have to deal with this issue. Unfortunately, I don't have time to delve into this at the moment, but this fix allows MOM5 users to track particles in the Arctic, finally!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug coding/Python help wanted oceanography Issues that require knowledge of oceanography to complete
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants