New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workers #4158
Comments
Specs document is up here. |
We really want the ability to have multiple remote workers because our Octopus Server is on the other side of a firewall. Octopus needs to interact with F5 Load Balancers and Network shares. A single remote worker is perfect for this use case, unless you use octopus across multiple datacenters. We need a remote worker in every datacenter. |
@spuder That is coming in 1-2 months, see the referenced spec above. |
|
Still very much looking forward to this feature. |
Release Note: Octopus now allows multiple external workers, grouped into pools. |
So excited to see this feature. Will it be possible to define a worker pool by a variable (e.g. datacenter variable) |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you think you've found a related issue, please contact our support team so we can triage your issue, and make sure it's handled appropriately. |
Implement Workers.
TL;DR: Tentacles and SSH targets can be added to pools. Steps can be run on a pool. Pools are not tied to environments. A default pool with a tentacle hosted by the server will be shipped OOTB, with the option to turn it off.
UserVoice
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: