Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Active directory users cannot log in after 1.6 to 2.0 migration #456

Closed
nblumhardt opened this issue Jan 7, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Active directory users cannot log in after 1.6 to 2.0 migration #456

nblumhardt opened this issue Jan 7, 2014 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/bug This issue represents a verified problem we are committed to solving
Milestone

Comments

@nblumhardt
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@nblumhardt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This might be because 1.0 uses the Windows username, while 2.0 uses the UPN. If so, we can append a domain to usernames when migrating.

@nblumhardt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nblumhardt
Copy link
Contributor Author

When migrating from Octopus 1.6, we'll now use the currently connected domain to derive the UPN.

A different UPN suffix can be specified by migrating with the command-line:

Octopus.Server migrate --upn-suffix=mycompany.com ...

@plukevdh
Copy link

I'm still having issues here, possibly because of a strange setup in our system. I'm using an account on one domain controller to gain access to our AD instance on a separate domain. There is a trust between the two so that either domain should work (mysite.com vs mysite.inside).

Certain infrastructure trusts mysite.local creds, but the initial AD query is made by mysite.inside creds because you have to authenticate with a trusted DC first… This is mostly an attempt to isolate our corp auth system from our developer network which is a bit more volatile. But there is a two-way trust between both forests.

The fail looks like post-migration having tried to use the --upn-suffix flag:

sign in - octopus deploy 2014-01-10 10-52-04

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Nov 28, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you think you've found a related issue, please contact our support team so we can triage your issue, and make sure it's handled appropriately.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 28, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kind/bug This issue represents a verified problem we are committed to solving
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants