Replies: 3 comments
-
Reading into the old issues is pretty interesting. To me it is surprising that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
This is better: unset? all [] ;== true
unset? all [()] ;== true |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
So now it is: all [
print "Testing ANY"
none? any []
none? any [()]
1 = any [() 1]
print "Testing ALL"
1 = all [1 ()]
unset? all []
unset? all [()]
print "Tests OK"
] ;== true |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Should I make this change?
Current version (compatible with Red (almost) and Rebol2):
after change:
In original R3 alpha it was:
Related discussion: http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/r3blog.r?view=0207
Related issues:
Oldes/Rebol-issues#564
Oldes/Rebol-issues#850
Oldes/Rebol-issues#2248
And also:
red/REP#85
red/red#4469
red/red#4482
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions