Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Conflict between connectivity-service topology constrains #437

Open
arthurMll opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Conflict between connectivity-service topology constrains #437

arthurMll opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@nigel-r-davis
Labels
clarification
Projects
Connectivity Framework
Milestone
2.2.0

Comments

@arthurMll
Copy link
Collaborator

The tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/diversity-policy and the tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/topology/node/link-inclusion constrains can be potentially incompatible.
In general the usage of some diversity-policies defined is not clear:

  • NODE, LINK policies -> My assumption is when you include this policy within a connectivity-service, that service should be disjoint to the list of NODE/LINKs another service’s (within diversity-exclusion attribute?) route travels across.
  • SRLG, SRNG-> In general the definition of SRGs is not clear to me.
  • SNG -> ????
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nigel-r-davis nigel-r-davis

Labels
clarification
Projects
Connectivity Framework
  
Open Issues
Milestone
2.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@karthik-sethuraman @nigel-r-davis @arthurMll