Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify semantics around link supplier #87

Closed
lgs85 opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Clarify semantics around link supplier #87

lgs85 opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Domain expert This issue relates to domain-specific expertise Schema
Milestone

Comments

@lgs85
Copy link
Contributor

lgs85 commented Sep 12, 2022

The conceptual model working paper discusses the idea of a 'supplier' for a link. It would be good to have a clear definition of what is meant by this. Specifically, should a supplier refer to:

  • the builder/installer, i.e. the company that installs the cable
  • the supplier, i.e. the company that the cable is purchased from
  • the manufacturer, i.e. the company that manufacturers the cable.

PROPOSAL
Based on comments from the technical working group on the working paper and slides (e.g. here and here) it appears as though the builder/installer is the most relevant organisation here. We therefore propose to define a link supplier as:

The organisation responsible for installing the cable for this link.

Based on comments in the working paper, each link would have one supplier.

This issue is to check whether this interpretation is correct and to explore alternative descriptions of link suppliers.

@lgs85 lgs85 added Schema Domain expert This issue relates to domain-specific expertise labels Sep 12, 2022
@lgs85 lgs85 added this to the Alpha milestone Sep 12, 2022
@duncandewhurst duncandewhurst modified the milestones: Alpha, Beta Sep 14, 2022
@duncandewhurst
Copy link
Collaborator

duncandewhurst commented Sep 14, 2022

The alpha schema and codelists added in #101 reflect the latest proposal in this issue.

This issue will remain open against the beta milestone to gather feedback from the alpha consultation.

@duncandewhurst
Copy link
Collaborator

We've not heard any further feedback on this issue so I'm going to close it for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Domain expert This issue relates to domain-specific expertise Schema
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants