You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When an intrusion set attacks a country that is located in a region, then there is an inferred relation that states that the intrusion set also attacks the region.
However, when the intrusion set is set to attack the region, which has a country located in it, then there is no inferred relation that states that the intrusion set also attacks the country.
This causes attacking intrusion sets not to be displayed when viewing an individual country, even though intrusion sets that are targeting a region that includes the country clearly are also targeting the single country.
Current Workaround
None.
Proposed Solution
Implement inferred relation also the other way round, as described above.
Additional Information
None.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
SamuelHassine
added
bug
use for describing something not working as expected
and removed
feature
use for describing a new feature to develop
labels
Oct 14, 2019
Problem to Solve
When an intrusion set attacks a country that is located in a region, then there is an inferred relation that states that the intrusion set also attacks the region.
However, when the intrusion set is set to attack the region, which has a country located in it, then there is no inferred relation that states that the intrusion set also attacks the country.
This causes attacking intrusion sets not to be displayed when viewing an individual country, even though intrusion sets that are targeting a region that includes the country clearly are also targeting the single country.
Current Workaround
None.
Proposed Solution
Implement inferred relation also the other way round, as described above.
Additional Information
None.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: