Updates to 9.3.3.1 must state what happens when a discriminator evalutes to true.

[mbeckerle]

(Formerly Action 319/Tracker 364 of the DFDL Workgroup. Recasting this as a public comment just to put all outstanding issues in one place)

Specifics include to clarify positive discriminator case in nested-choice scenario - that the inner-most discriminator is resolved. Subsequent discriminators resolve outward in the nest of discriminators.

[mbeckerle]

Specifically missing is discussion of the nested scenario for the positive discriminator case. Existing language really only talks about the failed discriminator case.

[mbeckerle]

Paragraph added to 9.3.3.1:

"A discriminator always resolves the nearest enclosing point of uncertainty that is unresolved. If more than one discriminator is evaluated, the first resolves the nearest enclosing point of uncertainty. The second the next nearest enclosing point, and so on. "