Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use MRIQC or MRQy to establish classical image quality metrics #133

Open
dzenanz opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Use MRIQC or MRQy to establish classical image quality metrics #133

dzenanz opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects

Comments

@dzenanz
Copy link
Member

dzenanz commented Sep 2, 2021

Classical image quality metrics can be additional information, in addition to outputs of our trained neural network models.

MRIQC: https://github.com/poldracklab/mriqc
MRQy: https://github.com/ccipd/MRQy

@dzenanz dzenanz added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 2, 2021
@dzenanz dzenanz added this to Backlog in scrum board via automation Sep 2, 2021
@dzenanz
Copy link
Member Author

dzenanz commented Sep 2, 2021

See old an issue in the old repository:
OpenImaging/miqa-phase1#34

@curtislisle
Copy link
Contributor

curtislisle commented Dec 16, 2021

Our opportunity to integrate MRIQC or MRQA could be accomplished by defining these as "models" similar to what we are currently doing for Dzénan's NN_inference model. We might consider extending MIQA to support a list of Evaluation objects attached to a Frame instead of the current 1:1 relationship. I don't know what other problems that might cause, though...

@dzenanz dzenanz mentioned this issue Apr 12, 2022
@annehaley annehaley moved this from Backlog to Sprint Ready in scrum board Sep 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
scrum board
Sprint Ready
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants