-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
conda builds not working anymore #6514
Comments
Issue nr2: our builds do not show the correct outcome
|
Where do you see those errors? I see https://abibuilder.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/jenkins/job/openms/job/ntly/job/conda/477/ looking successful. |
its in the console output |
fixed with: |
TODO:
|
btw I asked Björn and he said that he thinks you need to specify python versions you want to build... there is no shortcut for building a range of python verison |
Can you check if you can read that from somewhere in the repo. Due to issues with the nightly wheels and different versions on Ubuntu,macOS,Win, I would like to fix a supported version file somewhere |
For the time being add 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 |
Reduced to "major". It works now but the build statuses are still wrong. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Weird, tells me sth different: |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
yes, as discussed because bioconda build is bugged |
|
but it seems to upload it??? |
yes because it's bugged. bioconda build does not do the upload. |
Someone NEEDS to file a bug report. |
Or you parse the logs and ignore this specific error. |
Wild guess: conda's has a new package format? Packages now end with |
Hmm good guess, but it failed since years. It never worked to build inside a container when specifying you own repository. Your guess will probably lead to additional trouble since we did not know about it. |
Timo has submitted a bug report. In the meantime I just created a soft-link between the directory that conda expects it to be in, and where it actually is. This resolves the issue for now. |
This actually broke the builds completely. Seems like the env needs to be empty and due to the soft link, it is not anymore. |
Okay, I've rolled that back. With Timo's update the Job should pass now even if the upload fails. Is that sufficient as a stopgap until we get a response from the bioconda folks? |
But the update from Timo now only checks upload. And upload will always work because there is an artifact from a previous build. So we don't see any failures ever. There must be another way:
|
Still need to get bioconda/bioconda-utils#838 merged |
https://abibuilder.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/jenkins/job/openms/job/ntly/job/conda/475/console
no idea why.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: