Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libx265.so.192 is required by ffmpeg/vlc (Bugzilla Bug 2667) #2667

Closed
tpgxyz opened this issue Sep 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

libx265.so.192 is required by ffmpeg/vlc (Bugzilla Bug 2667) #2667

tpgxyz opened this issue Sep 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Bug confirmed solved Bug solved

Comments

@tpgxyz
Copy link
Member

tpgxyz commented Sep 24, 2021

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github

Bugzilla Bug 2667

Date: 2021-01-04 18:01:57 +0000
From: @filjob
To: @berolinux
CC: angrypenguinpoland@gmail.com, @benbullard79, @berolinux, bugs@openmandriva.org, nix.or.die@gmail.com, nobodydead@gmail.com, @filjob

Last updated: 2021-01-04 22:15:27 +0000

Comment 20521

Date: 2021-01-04 18:01:57 +0000
From: @filjob

Hello,

As mentioned in the previous bug I have just reported (#2665), I have recently switched to Rolling from Rock. One of the reason for the switch was to see if the issue I encountered in Rock with ffmpeg and libx265.so was fixed in Rolling with the new ffmpeg version. But in fact it is the same issue with a different libx265.so version. Let me explain:

in Rolling:
$ ffmpeg -i concat:VTS_01_1.VOB|VTS_01_2.VOB|VTS_01_3.VOB|VTS_01_4.VOB|VTS_01_5.VOB|VTS_01_6.VOB -map 0:v:0? -map 0:a:0 -codec:a libmp3lame qscale:a 2 -codec:v libx265 movie.mp4
...
libx265.so.192: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libx265.so.192 is missing, x265 support will be disabled
...

The installed package in Rolling is '179':
$ dnf list lib64x265*
Dernière vérification de l’expiration des métadonnées effectuée il y a 21:43:53 le dim. 03 janv. 2021 21:09:27.
Paquets installés
lib64x265_179.x86_64 3.2.1-1 @release-x86_64-restricted

Is there a way to have the lib64x265_192 package requested by ffmpeg without breaking other dependencies?

Thank you

Olivier

Comment 20522

Date: 2021-01-04 18:35:23 +0000
From: AngryPenguin <angrypenguinpoland@gmail.com>

Hi.

Looks like library lib64x265_192 is already in the Rolling repo.

This issues is probably because you upgrade from Rock to Rolling and dnf not update this packages then.

So quick fix it:
1: remove lib64x265 and x265
2: install again from repositoty
sudo dnf install x264 lib64x265_192

Let me know if this works.

Comment 20523

Date: 2021-01-04 19:15:41 +0000
From: @filjob

that's weird. lib64x265_192 cannot be found. Below the French (sorry I hope you can decode/guess :) ) output:

$ dnf repolist
id du dépôt nom du dépôt
rolling-x86_64 OpenMandriva Rolling - x86_64

$ sudo dnf clean all ; sudo dnf --allowerasing distro-sync
[sudo] Mot de passe de olivier :
5 fichiers supprimés
OpenMandriva Rolling - x86_64 1.8 MB/s | 25 MB 00:13
Dernière vérification de l’expiration des métadonnées effectuée il y a 0:00:06 le lun. 04 janv. 2021 20:04:46.
Dépendances résolues.
Rien à faire.
Terminé !

$ sudo dnf install lib64x265_192
Dernière vérification de l’expiration des métadonnées effectuée il y a 0:00:22 le lun. 04 janv. 2021 20:04:46.
Aucune correspondance pour le paramètre: lib64x265_192
Erreur : Impossible de trouver une correspondance: lib64x265_192

Comment 20524

Date: 2021-01-04 19:35:56 +0000
From: @berolinux

Looks like an incomplete update or an outdated mirror to me.

If you check
http://abf-downloads.openmandriva.org/rolling/repository/x86_64/restricted/release/
you'll see lib64x265_192 is where it needs to be.

Maybe you've switched "main" to rolling but "restricted" is still on rock?

Comment 20526

Date: 2021-01-04 22:15:27 +0000
From: @filjob

Correct, I had only switched Main to Rolling. I have added Restricted and lib64x265_192 has been installed. Thank you for the quick support. This closes the bug

@tpgxyz tpgxyz added the bug Bug confirmed label Sep 24, 2021
@rugyada rugyada added the solved Bug solved label Sep 24, 2021
@rugyada rugyada closed this as completed Sep 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Bug confirmed solved Bug solved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants