Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Commercially available compounds similar to OSM-S-106 (Late Jan 2019 search) #13

Open
mbhebhe opened this issue Jan 29, 2019 · 14 comments
Labels
Molecule Suggestion Needs Action for items that need action

Comments

@mbhebhe
Copy link
Contributor

mbhebhe commented Jan 29, 2019

image

@cdsouthan did a search on compounds similar to our hit compound (OSM-S-106). There were 33 compounds; some are already in our OSM library, others are not commercially available and some are (picture above). So we need to decide which ones (of the list above) we should purchase and send to Dundee for biological evaluation.

See Issue #12 for more info

@cdsouthan
Copy link
Member

Could @holeung manage a 3D overlay?

@MFernflower MFernflower changed the title Compounds similar to OSM-S-106 (Jan 2019 search) Compounds similar to OSM-S-106 (Late Jan 2019 search) Jan 30, 2019
@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

My vote is for these two molecules based on cost and overall lookalikeness of them to the s3 hit
_vote

@MFernflower MFernflower changed the title Compounds similar to OSM-S-106 (Late Jan 2019 search) Commercially available compounds similar to OSM-S-106 (Late Jan 2019 search) Jan 30, 2019
@mbhebhe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mbhebhe commented Jan 31, 2019

I agree with @MFernflower. Although in the past not having a primary sulfonamide has reduced potency. I think doing a 3D overlay would be good.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Feb 1, 2019

I feel it's important for all to note that the only one with an exposed sulfonamide is going to cost upwards of 2000 usd to screen against malaria (unless @mbhebhe can take a shot at making it?)

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

I'd like to hear from @mbhebhe and/or @mattodd regarding a final opinion on this - I still think sending a few select or all? of the Enamine LTD compounds listed would be the best option

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

@holeung Would it be possible to dock some of these drugs to your model of the TRNA synthase?

@mbhebhe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mbhebhe commented Mar 20, 2019

Sending all the enamine compounds is a good idea as they are not expensive.

@cdsouthan
Copy link
Member

Fine, Ukraine chemists are good value :) However, best to do a precautionary independent purity check (but only later on the good hits)

@MedChemProf
Copy link
Member

I second @cdsouthan 's purity check with one additional caveat. Multiple times I have seen hits from commercial vendors repeat and have a good purity profile via LCMS, but then subsequently fail following testing after in-house synthesis. Not a deal breaker, just something to be cognizant about.

@cdsouthan
Copy link
Member

cdsouthan commented Mar 20, 2019

Ho hum - so pure but wrong? (welcome back @MedChemProf by the way :)

@drc007
Copy link
Contributor

drc007 commented Mar 20, 2019

As they say "Trust but verify".

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Mar 20, 2019

Always good to verify your hits - especially when the hit is from a commercial library!

We should screen the products first and then verify the ones that show activity @mbhebhe

@MFernflower MFernflower added Needs Action for items that need action and removed question labels Mar 20, 2019
@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented Mar 21, 2019 via email

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Mar 21, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Molecule Suggestion Needs Action for items that need action
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants