Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Prometheus remote read? #1908

Open
cequencer opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Support for Prometheus remote read? #1908

cequencer opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@cequencer
Copy link

cequencer commented Feb 4, 2020

According to Prometheus' documentation on "Remote Endpionts and Storage" only "remote write" support for OpenTSDB is available. What is the current status for supporting Prometheus' remote read support?

Is this a feature that is in the works? (I did a search against the issues here, but did not find any)
Is this to be worked on for the OpenTSDB 2.x or 3.x branch?
Hopefully this is the right place for this question.

A quick internet search shows some grass root attempts or inquiries but none of them are viable options.

  1. Support OpenTSDB remote read  prometheus/prometheus#4707
  2. https://github.com/caitong93/opentsdb-adapter
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59319736/what-that-mean-some-db-for-prometheus-remote-storage-have-no-read-adapter
  4. https://circleci.com/gh/G-Research/geras/tree/master

The most promising lead I could find was geras. But that build is currently failing and it is a relative new project. If there are other viable options I should look at, I am all ears.

Thanks!

@manolama
Copy link
Member

We didn't have an API that would satisfy Prometheus' requirements I'm guessing as they likely want to push down a lot of functions to the remote. This should be easy to add with 3.x as we now have a Prometheus plugin that will accept PromQL. It's still alpha though and I need help testing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants