We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For instance, assuming a max line length of 23 characters consider the following query:
g.V(1).emit().repeat(out()).times(2).path().by('name')
It is currently formatted like this (on the same line as the previous step, as if it was modulating the previous step):
g.V(1).emit(). repeat(out()). times(2). path().by('name')
Should it rather be formatted like this (not treated as a modulator, I'm kind of leaning towards this one):
g.V(1). emit(). repeat(out()). times(2). path().by('name')
Or like this (on the same line, but before the step it is modulating):
g.V(1). emit().repeat(out()). times(2). path().by('name')
Or like this (indented relative to the step it is modulating):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
For instance, assuming a max line length of 23 characters consider the following query:
It is currently formatted like this (on the same line as the previous step, as if it was modulating the previous step):
Should it rather be formatted like this (not treated as a modulator, I'm kind of leaning towards this one):
Or like this (on the same line, but before the step it is modulating):
Or like this (indented relative to the step it is modulating):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: