Risky rule options #7313
Replies: 3 comments
-
👍 , this would also allow for a risky-option for I run into this a bunch of times and would be really great to have this. (not sure about the product roadmap/prio's etc. of course) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As long as the enable/disable of all individual options are still under the user's control, I'm all for this! (So not magically enabling all risky options because "allow risky is true") |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I believe idea is valid, yet not planned as a focus nowadays. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently we are able to mark a rule as risky (meaning applying it might change code's behavior). Though this means every possible change that can be applied is considered risky.
Being able to mark only a single option of a non-risky rule would allow making rules that can apply non-risky changes by default and optionally apply risky changes. Current setup requires two separate rules.
Maybe a good use case would be #4652.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions