You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example, if user have 10 masternodes, allow the user to vote with 7 masternodes only, while 3 masternodes can stay "neutral". It offers the ability to Masternode owner to vote for some proposals with more yes votes and on the other proposals with less yes votes, without downvoting any proposal. It allows the user to vote according to his/hers own priority list which proposals are worth more and which less.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this is such an edge case that the solution would simply be to use the already existing "alias" option for mnbudgetvote to explicitly vote with specific MNs. Yes, it means re-running the command multiple times. That is preferable compared to adding more bloat/complication to the RPC command.
For example, if user have 10 masternodes, allow the user to vote with 7 masternodes only, while 3 masternodes can stay "neutral". It offers the ability to Masternode owner to vote for some proposals with more yes votes and on the other proposals with less yes votes, without downvoting any proposal. It allows the user to vote according to his/hers own priority list which proposals are worth more and which less.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: