Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite inverse methods of model estimation #189

Conversation

BjoernLudwigPTB
Copy link
Member

@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB commented Nov 6, 2020

This will finally resolve #147.

Merge and rewrite

  • LSIIR, invLSIIR and invLSIIR_unc based on Monte Carlo,
  • LSFIR, invLSFIR, invLSFIR_unc, invLSFIR_uncMC.
  • After reviewing all this, we should merge Refactor and finally finish implementation #251 into this one here and then merge all that into prepare_major_release_2.0.0

Checkout the docs as well to be sure they look nicely: https://pydynamic.readthedocs.io/en/fix-147_rewrite_inverse_methods_of_model_estimation

@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB self-assigned this Nov 6, 2020
@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB changed the title Fix/#147 rewrite inverse methods of model estimation Fix #147 rewrite inverse methods of model estimation Nov 6, 2020
@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB changed the title Fix #147 rewrite inverse methods of model estimation Rewrite inverse methods of model estimation Nov 6, 2020
@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2020
12 tasks
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #189 (8118b55) into prepare_major_release_2.0.0 (f4ea51c) will increase coverage by 2.62%.
The diff coverage is 52.17%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##           prepare_major_release_2.0.0     #189      +/-   ##
===============================================================
+ Coverage                        49.72%   52.34%   +2.62%     
===============================================================
  Files                               24       24              
  Lines                             1798     1790       -8     
  Branches                           315      319       +4     
===============================================================
+ Hits                               894      937      +43     
+ Misses                             818      760      -58     
- Partials                            86       93       +7     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
PyDynamic/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
PyDynamic/misc/filterstuff.py 60.65% <ø> (+26.22%) ⬆️
PyDynamic/model_estimation/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
PyDynamic/model_estimation/fit_filter.py 31.96% <52.17%> (+13.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f4ea51c...d58d702. Read the comment docs.

@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB removed the request for review from mgrub November 6, 2020 21:54
@BjoernLudwigPTB
Copy link
Member Author

Before I start to work on LSFIR and the others it would be great if @mgrub @eichstaedtPTB we could take a peek together (do a line by line code review) and you could give some feedback on the approaches I have chosen. I will adress this on next tuesday.

test/conftest.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PyDynamic/model_estimation/fit_filter.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PyDynamic/model_estimation/fit_filter.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PyDynamic/model_estimation/fit_filter.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PyDynamic/model_estimation/fit_filter.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@mgrub mgrub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great and extensive work!

Is there a reason, that the testing of the model_estimation-module is done in test_identification.py? Would a cosmetic change to test_model_estimation.py be suitable?

test/test_identification.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PyDynamic/model_estimation/fit_filter.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…_comparison

Improve random covariance check for positive semi-definiteness
…nto refactor_and_finally_finish_implementation
…nto refactor_and_finally_finish_implementation

# Conflicts:
#	test/test_LSFIR.py
…reciprocal with uncertainties

BREAKING CHANGE:
Combine _deconvolution.fit_filter_ and _identification.fit_filter_ into
_model_estimation.fit_filter_ and provide access to all functionality via according
parameter sets for _model_estimation.fit_filter.LSFIR_ and _model_estimation.fit_filter.LSIIR_.
@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2021 15:32
@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB merged commit bed552b into prepare_major_release_2.0.0 Nov 4, 2021
@BjoernLudwigPTB BjoernLudwigPTB deleted the fix/#147_rewrite_inverse_methods_of_model_estimation branch November 4, 2021 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants