You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not related to a problem. But the Digikey API has set v3 to be depreciated and I anticipate that Digikey will remove v3 in the near future. They are currently on v4 and this is the recommended API to use.
Describe the solution you'd like
Part-DB should be updated to use the Digikey v4 API for product information
Describe alternatives you've considered
n/a
Additional context
This is a continuation of the issue #579
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see no urgent need for that right now. The old API is just deprecated and I could not find a timescale on when digikey is planning to remove support for the old one.
Maybe I will look into it, when I have time, but digikey changed some structure of its API so it requires pretty much changes to Part-DB.
I see I have been experiencing "issues" where every other part that I am entering in via Digikey is giving me an authentication error. I need to re-do the OAuth. Not a big problem because I do it and it works again. I am wondering if it is related to the v4 vs v3. I am also wondering if other users might experiencing issues related to this as well.
I cannot get OAuth to work. I've setup the env vars and all, but when I click the OAuth button, I get the following error from Digikey. I've checked that I have the correct client_id set as an ENV VAR.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not related to a problem. But the Digikey API has set v3 to be depreciated and I anticipate that Digikey will remove v3 in the near future. They are currently on v4 and this is the recommended API to use.
Describe the solution you'd like
Part-DB should be updated to use the Digikey v4 API for product information
Describe alternatives you've considered
n/a
Additional context
This is a continuation of the issue #579
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: