Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Documentation for ServiceControl's required .NET Framework version #1447

Closed
TraGicCode opened this issue Oct 8, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@TraGicCode
Copy link
Contributor

TraGicCode commented Oct 8, 2018

ServiceControl is currently built to run under the .NET Framework v4.6.1. Below is the error you get when attempting to perform the install on a machine without this version of the framework installed.

ServiceControl cannot be installed on systems with .NET Framework version lower than 4.6.1

Incorrect Documentation link

https://docs.particular.net/servicecontrol/installation#prerequisites

Related Issues

#1307
#1371

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Contributor

@TraGicCode

thanks for pointing that out. We have it documented in the upgrade guide

https://docs.particular.net/servicecontrol/upgrades/2to3#prerequisites

but unfortunately not reflected that in the link you mentioned. I will raise corresponding issue in the documentation repository soon

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Contributor

@TraGicCode Another question from my side. The ServiceControl installer bundles the .NET Framework 4.6.1 as part of the installation package. We tested that on clean machines and tests seemed to indicate that it got properly installed. Did this not work for you on the machine you tested?

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Contributor

@TraGicCode
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @danielmarbach ,

From my testing it is not bundled and the install failes on a fresh vagrant machine with windows server 2012 R2.

Thanks,
Michael Fyffe

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @TraGicCode

Many thanks for reporting back. I think I've found the culprit in the installer logic. #1460

Thanks
Daniel

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Contributor

Raised #1461 for further investigation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants