-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would you be willing to use the tag feature to create a downloadable copy of a specific version? #1161
Comments
Tagged versions are available from here: https://github.com/Peergos/web-ui/tags |
Thanks @kevodwyer Take care See you and happy hacking ! |
Thank you for providing a link to Tags for the Peergos web-ui. However, what we are reviewing is https://github.com/Peergos/Peergos. Would it be possible to get a tagged release for that repo? Or am I misunderstanding the connection between /Peergos and /web-ui? @kevodwyer |
We don't release builds of this repo without the web-ui. This repo is built from the web-ui repo via a git submodule. |
@ianopolous Thanks, I'll tell my friends that See you Take care and happy hacking ! |
Thank you for clarifying. The issue from the FSD's point of view is that Peergos could have its licensing changed regardless of the web-ui or other programs connected to it as a submodule. This is why the FSD requires a specific released version. |
Hi!
It looks like someone has added Peergos to the Free Software Directory (FSD). Thank you for creating Peergos and releasing it as free software under the AGPLv3! I really would like to approve it on the FSD, but what is preventing me from doing so is the FSD's requirement to review a specific version of Peergos's code base. The best way for us to review a specific version is if a project uses the "Tag" feature on the Peergos Github Repo. Besides being able to review a version, it also allows anyone to download the code without running Github's nonfree Javascript. Would you be willing to use the tag feature to create a downloadable copy of a specific version?
Thank you for your consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: