-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V3 Subgraph: Set up dedicated graph node infrastructure for V3 subgraph. #44
Comments
Open questions Should we run open-ethereum and turbo geth or just turbogeth? Turbo geth and the graph index node have had releases so we should be updating to the latest version. We should front load all dev ops tasks |
Question: when is this infra to be delivered? |
We should an influx db and the dex agnostic data feeder to the infra requirements for launch. |
I took a look at the managed options for InfluxDB on GCP: https://www.influxdata.com/products/influxdb-cloud/
It looks like they're only in |
Zaki and I were are discussing setting up one (or more) turbogeth nodes dedicated to v3, based on a current turbogeth snapshot. Set up a new graph node for it and connect it to a separate PSQL database. Connecting several graph nodes to the same turbogeth has limitations and is likely to slow things down. Infrastructure deployment plan for May 5th proposed next steps:
|
I believe this is also complete cc @kkennis |
Done! Thanks team |
We have graph nodes running in GCP (for instance, currently indexing V2), but for V3 we want a dedicated graph node for reliability's sake. This graph node can share a turbo-geth instance with the other graph nodes - the private IP for this node is available in the Instances section of GCP.
The implementor of this task should create the node, start it, and make it ready for subgraph deployment.
Acceptance Criteria:
cargo
environmentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: