-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 560
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
5.8.9 won't run suid program #9608
Comments
From fc@fc.freebsd.orgCreated by craig@animalhead.comBuilt 5.8.9 from source with conditions identical to those under which our But the resulting perl5.8.9 would not run the control panel. The following grep told me that the message was in perl.c. An inspection of the code in perl.c in release 5.8.9, line 3727 is if (*suidscript) { Making this change, rebuilding perl, and restarting Apache makes the Releasing a simple clerical error like this does not speak well for the You're welcome, Perl Info
|
From @nwc10Thanks for the bug report. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:30:26PM -0800, fc@fc.freebsd.org (via RT) wrote:
Yes, suidperl is deprecated, and, that does appear to be the correct fix for You are correct that it suggests that the suidperl is under tested. We know However, in the 4 weeks and two release candidates for 5.8.9 it seems that Had anyone who needed it actually tested it, this bug would have been averted. Nicholas Clark |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From Robin.Barker@npl.co.uk
suidscript is a bool* so comparison with 1 is not sound Elsewhere in patch 33168, C<suidscript != 1> is replaced by C<!suidscript> so I suspect the test is just inverted Robin |
From @jkeenanOn Mon Dec 22 07:26:41 2008, nicholas wrote:
Nicholas, I suspect we should have closed this ticket four years ago. Do you agree? Thank you very much. |
From @nwc10On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 02:59:58PM -0800, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
It was not clear 4 years ago whether there would be a 5.8.10 release. Also, really, this ticket is "abandoned" rather than "resolved". I hope that the RT upgrade will let us make that distinction. Nicholas Clark * Actually, by the workflow that we're currently using, because we don't have |
From @jkeenanOn Mon Feb 25 04:30:04 2013, nicholas wrote:
Don't hold your breath ;-)
Can we close the ticket now and, if so, with which Status? Thank you very much. |
From @nwc10On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 06:42:49PM -0700, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
I haven't been. But the rt.cpan.org update is done, out there and looking
I believe so. There won't be a release which fixes this. (Which, actually, applies to this ticket, as it was fixed for 5.10.1) Nicholas Clark |
From @jkeenanOn Sat May 11 06:08:07 2013, nicholas wrote:
As Nicholas says: "Fix is shipped in a newer stable release and we're not going to Resolved as Rejected, which is the closest we have to Won't Fix. |
@jkeenan - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#61592 (status was 'rejected')
Searchable as RT61592$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: