Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 3, 2021. It is now read-only.

Update babel-eslint to version 5.0.0 πŸš€ #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

babel-eslint just published its new version 5.0.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of babel-eslint – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


GitHub Release

v5.0.0 is just v5.0.0-beta10 with less files in node_modules


The new version differs by 71 commits .

  • 0f20099 5.0.0
  • 278579f Update README.md
  • 11c2f03 Merge pull request #255 from deepsweet/npm-ignore
  • 3b5f8f4 include onlyindex.jsin npm package
  • c0f1110 delete.npmignore``
  • f399c89 Merge pull request #250 from danez/patch-1
  • c71392e adjust test to also cover issue #239
  • 413b80e 5.0.0-beta10
  • 7a038d5 Merge pull request #246 from babel/escope-patterns
  • c80a386 fixup tests
  • 36f6638 fix typo
  • bd4eee9 check using__esModule``
  • b26bc58 Prevent escope referencer from traversing into param pattern type annotations
  • 0d30882 5.0.0-beta9
  • 71fadf0 Merge pull request #244 from christophehurpeau/patch-1

There are 71 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

pitzcarraldo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2016
Update babel-eslint to version 5.0.0 πŸš€
@pitzcarraldo pitzcarraldo merged commit b56d349 into master Feb 21, 2016
@pitzcarraldo pitzcarraldo deleted the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-5.0.0 branch February 21, 2016 16:38
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants