Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rec: unexpected SERVFAIL on a nodata answer for a secure domain #5861

Closed
giganteous opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5868
Closed

rec: unexpected SERVFAIL on a nodata answer for a secure domain #5861

giganteous opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5868

Comments

@giganteous
Copy link
Contributor

  • Program: Recursor
  • Issue type: Bug report

Short description

Signed domain gives SERVFAIL (bogus) answer on the AAAA query where auth says NODATA.

http://dnsviz.net/d/assets.webshopapp.com/dnssec/?rr=28&a=all&ds=all&ta=.&tk=

Environment

  • Operating system: Debian/stretch
  • Software version: 0.0.1798g0e9a0d5-1pdns.stretch
  • Software source: repo

Steps to reproduce

  1. load pdns-recursor
  2. dig AAAA assets.webshopapp.com @resolver

Expected behaviour

nodata

Actual behaviour

servfail

Other information

13:28|   rgacogne: looking
13:31|   rgacogne: I think I have a fix for that this case on a branch
13:31|   rgacogne: let me check
13:32|   rgacogne: yeah, it works fine on my branch
13:32|   rgacogne: I'm not ready to PR it yet, though :-/
13:32|     kaisan: rgacogne: do you want me to file it
13:33|   rgacogne: kaisan: if you don't mind, so I don't forget to PR and merge before rec 4.1.0 :)
@rgacogne rgacogne added this to the rec-4.1.0 milestone Oct 26, 2017
@rgacogne
Copy link
Member

rgacogne commented Oct 26, 2017

Our NSEC3 denial code is wrong for this exact case. I have a fix on a branch, just needs a bit of work before I can open a PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants