Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On FreeBSD, I guess the SO_REUSEPORT works but does not balance load evenly. FreeBSD 12(?) added the SO_REUSEPORT_LB option, which specifically does.
SO_REUSEPORT
SO_REUSEPORT_LB
I don't know if it's really worth adding. I know it was mentioned on IRC once in 2018, but I don't know if you've seriously considered it.
BIND (pull request), Knot DNS (commit), NSD and Nginx (commit) support it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Short description
On FreeBSD, I guess the
SO_REUSEPORT
works but does not balance load evenly. FreeBSD 12(?) added theSO_REUSEPORT_LB
option, which specifically does.I don't know if it's really worth adding. I know it was mentioned on IRC once in 2018, but I don't know if you've seriously considered it.
BIND (pull request), Knot DNS (commit), NSD and Nginx (commit) support it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: