Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rename providers term to be adapters #310

Closed
SteveL-MSFT opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #334
Closed

Rename providers term to be adapters #310

SteveL-MSFT opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #334
Assignees
@SteveL-MSFT
Labels
Issue-Enhancement The issue is a feature or idea WG-Reviewed

Comments

@SteveL-MSFT
Copy link
Member

Summary of the new feature / enhancement

adapters provides more clarity on the role of a group resource vs provider which may imply it implements the resource functionality itself.

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

No response
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT added Issue-Enhancement The issue is a feature or idea Need-Review labels Feb 6, 2024
@SteveL-MSFT
Copy link
Member Author

Agreed by WG

@SteveL-MSFT
Copy link
Member Author

SteveL-MSFT commented Feb 27, 2024 •
edited

Once we have Kind implemented, then PowerShellGroup resource should just be PowerShell. The group resources would drop the Group suffix with exception of the Microsoft.DSC/Group

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT self-assigned this Feb 27, 2024
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT mentioned this issue Feb 28, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT

Labels
Issue-Enhancement The issue is a feature or idea WG-Reviewed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

rename provider to adapter SteveL-MSFT/DSC
1 participant
@SteveL-MSFT