Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Win32-OpenSSH V8.9.1.0p1-Beta sending Ctrl+space is not clean enough to cause <c-space> not to be processed correctly #1971

Open
3 tasks done
mochazi opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@mochazi
Copy link

mochazi commented Aug 25, 2022

Prerequisites

  • Write a descriptive title.
  • Make sure you are able to repro it on the latest version
  • Search the existing issues.

Steps to reproduce

I'm using the Win32-OpenSSH V8.9.1.0p1-Beta version on Windows, connecting to a remote archlinux host, and using coc.nvim to code-completion by pressing the Ctrl + Space shortcut, but extra characters appear. In WSL2, Ctrl + Space successfully handles completion syntax. I suspect it's a problem with Win32-OpenSSH V8.9.1.0p1-Beta

Steps to reproduce

  1. Please install the latest version of Arch Linux in advance.
  2. Execute the install.sh script of vimrc to automatically install with one click.
  3. Using Win32-OpenSSH V8.9.1.0p1-Beta to connect to a remote Arch Linux host on Windows.
  4. Create arbitrary cpp files, such as vim demo.cpp
  5. Enter the cpp code, press Ctrl + Space to complete the code.

key code

Use <c-space> to trigger completion.

Expected behavior

Successfully handle code completion.

Actual behavior

Code completion, extra characters appear.

Error details

No response

Environment data

- Windows 10 Pro x86_64 21H2
- Windows Terminal x86_64 1.14.1962.0
- Win32-OpenSSH V8.9.1.0p1-Beta
- Arch Linux x86_64
- openSUSE Tumbleweed on Windows 10 x86_64 (WSL2)
- vim 9.0.236

Version

V8.9.1.0p1-Beta

Visuals

Expected behavior

opensuse(WSL)

Actual behavior

ArchLinux

OS Environment

ArchLinux版本
opensuse版本

@mgkuhn
Copy link

mgkuhn commented Sep 11, 2022

See also #1842

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants