Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a sitemap to incorporate the data on places #1352

Closed
gissoo opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Create a sitemap to incorporate the data on places #1352

gissoo opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
🕒🗺️ design design tasks on additional hours / non-cdh time

Comments

@gissoo
Copy link
Contributor

gissoo commented Apr 12, 2023

No description provided.

@gissoo gissoo added 💬 awaiting review Ready for comments and questions 🕒🗺️ design design tasks on additional hours / non-cdh time labels Apr 12, 2023
@gissoo gissoo self-assigned this Apr 12, 2023
@blms blms added 🗜️ awaiting testing Implemented and ready to be tested and removed 🗜️ awaiting testing Implemented and ready to be tested labels May 15, 2023
@gissoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

gissoo commented Jul 19, 2023

@blms please review this sitemap just to make sure we are on the same page

@blms
Copy link
Contributor

blms commented Jul 25, 2023

@gissoo (cc @kseniaryzhova) Can you point me towards the decision making process for going with a new search page for Places, rather than a browse view (I thought alphabetical by letter like People)? I had thought we were going with the latter with an option to browse by a map.

I ask because it will take a significant amount of additional backend work to implement a search index for places. If all we are indexing is a name (I remember the decision not to add descriptions), that seems like overkill, when an alphabetical browse would accomplish the same.

Also, do we need a checkbox like People for "should have a Place page", or will all places get a Place Detail page?

@gissoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

gissoo commented Aug 16, 2023

@blms sure, the decision making process came from both the findings from the research I conducted and conversations with Marina, Rachel and Ksenia. Here is the report from the research, below are a few points that would make the search functionality useful:

  • finding the judeoarabic vs Hebrew names of places as well as different names for a
    place – e.g. Alexandria vs. Cairo
  • seeing info for Various regions – e.g. maghreb, mashregh, sham
  • finding the functions of a place/city – e.g. if they raised animals and what kinds, what plants grew and were used, e.g. indigo, whether there was textile manufacturing
  • find out which documents mention a specific city

I think the search would make it easier to find specific places the researchers already have in mind. Without it information can still be accessible through document search, but it's not ideal since we are dedicating a browse section for places. The question is how hard would it be to find a specific region or place on the map without a keyword search? It also depends on the density of the information on the map.

@gissoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

gissoo commented Aug 16, 2023

I'll go ahead and close this issue.

@gissoo gissoo closed this as completed Aug 16, 2023
@gissoo gissoo removed the 💬 awaiting review Ready for comments and questions label Aug 16, 2023
@gissoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

gissoo commented Aug 16, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🕒🗺️ design design tasks on additional hours / non-cdh time
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants