Logo/label

[mikeapp]

It would be helpful to see the logo represented (or did I miss it?). Also, in addition to the requireStatement there is discussion of changing the logo to provider in order to allow a label. This would provide a label with identity of the agent/institution providing the manifest, as well as the logo. See IIIF/api#1639

[regisrob]

I agree the Manifest logo should be clearly displayed (this is a requirement for many institutions and it is clearly stated as a MUST in the Presentation API spec): it should appear somewhere in the catalog (at least in the album preview?) and also in the information/metadata panel of the album window.

I feel like the question of "attribution" will be quite challenging for the Mirador 3 UI design, because if Mirador 3 is meant to support both P-2 and P-3 Manifests, it would be expected to handle the display of both the requiredStatement and provider properties (P-API v3) and the old logo and attribution from P-API v2.1...

[regisrob]

related to #1

[ggeisler]

Thanks for pointing this out @mikeapp and @regisrob. We see ways to address this within our current design.